The Suppression of Inventor and Crucifixion of Perpetual Motion
Moving Towards The End of Energy Crisis
Why to Live with Less Energy?
Exploring Philosophical, Astronomical and Cosmological Foundations of Perpetual Motion in Vedas
Basic Fundamentals of Perpetual Motion
The Suppression of Inventor and Crucifixion of Perpetual Motion
The Mystery of Dynamic Universe:
Truth of Perpetual Motion and Limitations of Science, Exploring Ancient Wisdom
Flaws, Fallacies and Follies in Name of Science, Where Science Went Wrong?
The Story of Mans Hunt For Free Motive Power and Energy Perpetual Motion Retold
Perpetual Motion Retold From Discovery to Innovation. Part II
Councilor Orffyreus. Forgotten Inventor of Perpetual Motion
The Law of Conservation Of Energy A Long Stride on a Wrong Path Part I
The Law of Conservation Of Energy: A Long Stride on a Wrong Path, Part II
Free Energy Revolution, A Brief History of Free Energy
A Treatise on Design of Gravity Perpetual Motion
Energy From Nothing Perpetual Motion Bridges Science Technology and Religion
How Did It Happen? A Brief Story of My Journey of Perpetual Motion
The Loud Cry of A Perpetual Motionist. Is He a Crackpot or genius?
Green Chemistry : Dr. Ramesh Kumar Menaria
Green Chemistry
Postgraduate Department of Chemistry
SGG Govt. College, Banswara
Blogging on the Web
National Seminar
Paper Presented at National Seminar
Favorite Links
Family Photo Album
My Paintings
My Resume
Comment and Contact Me

Full Title Volume 5:

The Suppression of Inventor and Crucifixion of Perpetual Motion

Volume 5

Length of Volume 5:   250 pages




...William Shakespeare's tragedy “King Henry IV. Part II, Act I, Sc. II” has a deeply moving quote on death and perpetual motion. It appears that Shakespeare was well aware of difficulties and sufferings involved in the quest of perpetual motion. He speaks so lively as if he lived the tragedy and viscidities of the life of a perpetual motion inventor when he remarked:


“I were better to be eaten to death with a rust than to be scoured to nothing with perpetual motion.”


The sadness and tragedy in the quote moves us so much that we feel as though we have in our venture experienced a great loss and acquired nothing in spite of our great labours spent on perpetual motion. ...


....Lords Buddha once said : “ignorance is cause of sufferings”. But as far as suffering and suppression of a perpetual motion inventor is concerned, we have a unique case here.  It is because of scientist’s ignorance that perpetual motion and its inventor has suffered a lot.   Why does scientist ridicule “Perpetual Motion”? Out of ignorance, they often say: “Perpetual motion is impossible” and “perpetual motionist is a crackpot”. Physicist runs away from perpetual motion machine whenever somebody requests them to examine perpetual motion machine and thereby correct them. We have a long generation of Physicists who have buried the noble idea of perpetual motion by spreading the rumour “It is impossible to obtain perpetual motion.  In nutshell, we can say ultimate causes that are responsible for the debunking of perpetual motion  rest in the human psychology of physicists: full of ignorance, pride, prejudice and self-interest. Today physicist, his law of conservation of energy and energy interests of capitalists are main instruments of suppression, suffering, metaphorically speaking, physicists and energy racketeers are solely responsible for the Crucifixion of Perpetual motion. There are evil forces, which have constantly worked against perpetual motion. Stevenus of Brugs and Leonardo da Vinci were among first pioneers in disproving  Perpetual Motion. Now we are taught to believe that perpetual motion is impossible. Perpetual motion challenges present paradigm. This includes doing unwelcome research like perpetual motion.....

....Hundreds of authors of books have debunked perpetual motion machine in most vicious terms. They generally consider : perpetual motion often as one of the follies of science. Perpetual motion is fraught with many problems.  None of the book places perpetual motion in proper perspective. In his article entitled “Perpetual Motion: Illusion and Reality” Martin Gardner also debunks perpetual motion. ...

We have to follow Deva Ramananda’s advice. Don’t rely on books; don’t depend on what science states about perpetual motion. Scientist leaves no stone unturned to oppose perpetual motion. Only a wise man like perpetual motionist can steer the ship of perpetual motion, not the scientist.


Physics for centuries have ridiculed perpetual motion.  Is not universe a vast perpetual motion machine? Is not Orffyreus perpetual motion is solid evidence to disprove law of conservation of energy?  On what grounds physicists reject perpetual motion? Did they ever experiment with perpetual motion? If so how long did they experiment with perpetual motion? How many attempts they made to construct a perpetual motion machine? Perpetual motion inventor can never accept such nonsense. ...

....Rejection of Perpetual motion by Patent Office is another kind of suppression.  The plight of perpetual motion inventor never ends. Rejecting everything that is perpetual motion is only one instrument used by science to impede the perpetual motion and growth of knowledge. Perpetual Motion:


....A time-consuming comprehensive historical survey of perpetual motion  will reveal the truth that perpetual motion is possible and we have genuine inventors of perpetual motion in past who successfully invented and demonstrated perpetual motion in their life times. Idea of perpetual motion has been abandoned permanently. We can’t say how long science would continue to ridicule perpetual motion. How long Loud Cry of Perpetual Motion Inventor will go unheard? There have been many untold martyrs of perpetual motion.  In the end, Perpetual motion should be a lesson to scientist. …..






i         Preface    

ii        Acknowledgemnts     


1       Present Day Perpetual Motion  


2       Why Do They Ridicule “Perpetual Motion”?



2.1    Authors and their Books Against  Perpetual Motion    

2.2    John Phin

2.3    Martin Gardner

2.4    Daniel Herring  

2.5    Irving Adler       

2.6    Robert L. Park 

2.7    JSTOR Journal         


3       Their False Pride & Folly of Appeal to Authorities


3.1    False Pride        

3.2    Appeal to Authority  


3.3    Appeal to Expert       


4       Heroes or Rascals of Science? 

Their Ignorance of Perpetual Motion as Shown by their Ideas, Opinions, and Experiments


4.1    Dangers of Rascal Being Wise   

4.2    Perpetual Motion Now Has no Appeal to Scientist       

4.3    Stevenus of Brugs Disproves Perpetual Motion   

4.4    Leonardo da Vinci Suggests Perpetual Motion Inventor to Go to Alchemist- the Gold Seekers       

4.5    Galileo (1564-1642) Pendulum Does not Rise Higher from The Point of its Descent, thus, he Falsely Argued Perpetual motion is Impossible  

4.6    William Gilbert (1544-1603) Considers Efforts To Build A Magnetic Perpetual Motion As “Fictitious, Crazy, Deformed Labours”        

4.7    John Bernoulli Believed In Conservation Of Vis Viva.

4.8    De La Hire Gave The First Proof Of Impossibility Of Perpetual Motion        

4.9    Christian Huygens (1629-1695) 

4.10  Jacques Ozanam (1640-1717)


4.11  Isaac Newton (1642-1727)          

4.12  Roget       

4.13  Nicholas Leonardo Sadi Carnot (1796-1832)       

4.14  Williams Thomson (1824)  

4.15  Julius Robert Mayer (1814-78)  

4.16  James Prescott Joule (1818 – 89)       

4.17  Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894)

4.18  Percy Bridgman        

4.19  Sir James Jeans         

4.20  Sir Arthur Eddington

4.21  Henry Smith Williams        

4.22  Ernst Mach       

4.23  Dampier   

4.24  Albert Einstein 

4.25  Daniel Herring  

4.26  Holton      

4.27  Ilya Prigogine   

4.28  Jullian Huxely   

4.29  Dr. Isaac Asimov        

4.30  Milton A. Rothman   

4.31  Thanks to MIT Professors 

5       Suppression of Innovative Ideas


5.1    Energy Crisis Propaganda

5.2    “Disagreeing With The Dominant View Is Dangerous”-Brian Martin    

5.3    The Army of Opponents against Perpetual Motion       

5.4    Three Phases of Invention, Ridiculing, Opposition and Acceptance       

5.5    Resistance to New Idea      

5.6    Previously-Abhorrent Ideas        

5.7    Abhorrent Ideas in Transition     

5.8    Currently Abhorrent Ideas

5.9    Case of Alexander Graham Bell

5.10  The Case of Wright Brothers     

5.11  Laplace and Royal Academy of Science in Paris Rejects Perpetual motion  Patents ,1775   

5.12  Rejection of Perpetual motion by Patent Office  

5.12  Trade Journal “National Car and Locomotive Builder” 1891 considers Perpetual Motion as a Mechanical Fallacy 

5.13  Patent Office in Washington Demands a Working Model of Perpetual Motion, 1911    

5.14  Three Kinds of Repression of Invention       

5.15  Case of Hans Coler



6       Inventor Vs Scientist

Changing Scenario of Scientific Discovery 


6.1    Research Individual and Scientific Discovery       


7       Rejection of Innovators


8       The Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics        


8.1    The Cold Fusion Scandal   

8.2    Transmutation  


9       Crucifixion And Resurrection

Of Perpetual Motion


10     Loud Cry of Perpetual Motion Inventor


11     Notes and References        

12     Appendices       

          EEC Series of Books

          Author’s Introduction

The Mystery of Dynamic Universe

Hopefully, you will agree with my views that you will find in the pages of my EEC series of books but I am also equally aware that you may not agree with me on certain points discussed in these volumes. Before arriving at any definite conclusions to anything published in these books, I shall advise you to do your own research & contribute your own unique creative insights. My views and thoughts contained in these books are mostly anti scientific establishment, non-dogmatic. They contain explorations of ideas largely found in Eastern ancient Wisdom like Vedas etc, as well as my own creative ideas with freedom of thought. According to doctrine of “Syadvada” in Jainism, no truth is final, therefore, never bound yourself to saying this is the only truth. Truth is always plural and that which is plural is not the “absolute truth”!

Dr. Ramesh Menaria's entire EEC series of books with 18 titles fills up more than 7000 pages. Contents and page numbers of EEC series of books are subject to minor changes as all the 18 manuscripts are being edited and reedited until they finally get published by Deva publishers.

NB: This site will go on line long before all possible topics have been treated; please forgive me if you seek information on a given topic and I have no information there yet.

Dr. Ramesh menaria